I. Different positions that are held on this topic
Salvational
Miraculous
Others, as the word of God itself
Understanding it as what is saving you, or salvational, carries inconsistencies in doctrine, including what God has taught that is actually necessary for salvation, which will be discussed further in the class as it continues (ie., Acts 10:44, Acts 8:15-16)
II. Understanding the context of the Holy Spirit under the Christian dispensation
The Holy Spirit is not working the same way He once was in the first century
The Spirit was working miraculously, guiding them into all truth (John 14:26; 16:13)
The Spirit was confirming the word with signs (Mark 16:16-20)
The complete revelation given to us by the Spirit has been completed (2 Peter 1:20-21, 2 Peter 1:3, Ephesians 4:11-14, Jude 3)
Without these miraculous gifts, there would be no Christianity in the first century, as it was through these gifts the truth was being revealed
If it were not for the work of the Holy Spirit, we could not be Christians today, nor would we know how we should conduct ourselves as Christians without the word confirmed by the Spirit
III. Our method of hermeneutics in understanding the Bible
It needs to be under a first-century lens
Today, one is far removed from the historical context of the miraculous events that occurred in the first century. Consequently, people can easily read these passages and interpret them in a twenty-first-century context in which no miraculous gifts are possessed. The mistake occurs when reading these passages through twenty-first-century glasses instead of first-century glasses. (Wiggins, S. (n.d.). Receiving the Holy Spirit).
We understand we must read the word of God under a first-century lens when reading books such as Revelation, but we must apply this same hermeneutical principle to all the books given to us by God.
IV. Context of the text
Luke 24:49 is the context of Acts 1:8
Acts 2:1-4, the Holy Spirit falls upon the apostles
The crowd stood amazed, and then Peter began to preach (Acts 2:5-15)
Peter spoke of the miracles of Christ
Using the Bible to determine the gift
We need to let the Bible interpret the words we use
The gift of the Spirit is seen in
Acts 19:1-7
Acts 8:12-16
Acts 10:44, 11:15-17
Hebrews 2:3-4
1 Corinthians 12:3-4, 7-11
If the gifts of the Spirit always refer to the miraculous, then it would follow that it would be miraculous definitionally, as seen in Acts 2:38
Laying on of hands through apostles in Acts 8:12-16, 19:1-7
This corresponds with Mark 16:16-20
Place yourself in the shoes of someone there in the first century; how would they take this to be?
V. The promise is unto them (Acts 2:39)
Original manuscripts did not have chapter and verse breaks
The promise is unto them and their children and all who are afar off
Luke 24:49, Christ refers to the promise as the Spirit falling on the apostles
Same language used in Acts 1:4-5 to reiterate the promise of the Spirit
Receive (Acts 2:33)
It is stated that they have received the promise from the Father of the Holy Spirit
5 verses later (Acts 2:38), Peter uses both terms “receive” and “the promise”
VI. Miraculous gifts were not salvational
Judas did not send out miracles to help and cast out demons under the limited condition; Jesus said it would be better for him not to have been born (Matthew 26:24)
Caiaphas in John 11:49-52 prophesied that Christ would die for the nation. It is stated that this did not originate with Caiaphas. This is God working through someone who was actively involved in the plot to kill Jesus; just because he performed this does not mean that, at this moment, he was saved because of it. (Matthew 26:57-68)
Judas (limited commission)
Miraculous ability does not prove a right relationship with God (Matthew 7:21-23)
VII. Objections to the teaching
Stating that the gift is salvational
Cornelius and his household
Stating that the Holy Spirit fell upon them was salvational
Contextually, it was to prove the Gentiles could be grafted into the one body (Acts 2:39, Ephesians 2:17)
Miraculous gifts were confirming the word, and that word was to demonstrate that Gentiles were going to enter into the body of Christ
Peter's orderly account (Acts 11:1-3)
It fell upon them as it did them at the beginning
He states it fell on them like it did to them at the beginning
Peter is referencing the Spirit falling upon them in Acts 2:1-4
They had not yet heard the word
Acts 10:44, while Peter was speaking these words
Acts 11:15, as I began to speak
BDAG – to initiate a process
Strong's #806 means to begin, the beginning of a duration
You cannot hear as someone begins to speak; Romans 10:17: faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God
Acts 5:32
Used to prove the indwelling
Contextually, the apostles were giving a defense of the gospel
Christ anticipated these moments in Luke 12:11-12, Matthew 10:19-20, Mark 13:11)
Acts 5:32 is a partial fulfillment of the words spoken by Christ
If one claims this has applied to them, then they should claim to be inspired like the apostles were because this is the immediate context of this passage
We have the Holy Spirit through obedience
1 Peter 1:23
Romans 8:1-5
Galatians 5:16-25
VIII. Baptism is for us today; we have the word, which is the goal of the gift of the Spirit
The gift, baptism in the Spirit, laying on of hands for the Holy Spirit is not applicable to us today in the way that it was for the first-century audience in the immediate context
Mark 16:16-20: Christ says He who believes and is baptized will be saved, and these signs will follow
Those signs were following in the first century to confirm the word (Mark 16:20)